STUDY OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE EXTRATERRESTRIAL PRESENCE ON EARTH
"And to this day, [those] who...know the self as I am Brahman [IS-ness], become all this universe. Even the gods [any other dimensional beings] cannot prevent his becoming this, for he has become their Self. ...if a man worships another deity thinking: He is one and I am another, he does not know. He [who does not know] is like a sacrificial animal to the gods. As many animals serve a man, so does each man serve the gods. Even if one animal is taken away, it causes anguish to the owner; how much more so when many are taken away! Therefore it is not pleasing to the gods that men should know this [that they are IS-ness]." Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, I.iv.10
Filmmakers of gaia.com joined scientists and researchers outside of Nazca, Peru to investigate the discovery of an unearthed mummified body. Universities and independent scientists are currently analyzing findings and probing material that is unlike anything found in Peru. Is this a primitive human with "intentionally" developed deformities or the undeniable evidence of extraterrestrials visiting Earth?
Following the discovery of an anomalous mummified body near Nazca, Peru, independent scientists and universities begin analyzing samples of the 1600+ year-old body. Original CT scans reveal a well-preserved 5'6" three-fingered and three-toed body with an elongated skull.
It is time to take action again! It is time to take the destiny of our world in our own hands! We all agree that the process of reaching planetary peace is taking too long. Here is our chance to collectively speed up the process. Therefore we are using the opportunity of the Full Moon on April 11th to create a portal through which we will balance the energy field around the planet. We are doing this meditation to counteract the negative effects of the military escalation that is now taking place in Syria:
Make this viral! Share it worldwide! Please post it on your websites and blogs. Invite spiritual groups to join us. If you know an alternative media outlet, you can send it to them. You can create a Facebook group for your local group of people doing this in your part of the world. We also need one main Facebook group for this event. You can create a video about this and post it on Youtube.
Scientific studies have confirmed positive effects of mass meditations on human society, so each of you that will participate in this meditation can actually help bringing the Event closer to us:
This meditation helps the Light forces to ground the energy of Light on the surface of the planet to strengthen the Light grid which is needed to speed up the process of reaching planetary peace. Number of people doing that meditation is the single most influential factor within the power of the surface human population for speeding up the process.
We can reach the critical mass of 144,000 people doing this meditation!
Astrological chart for our meditation shows a cardinal grand square of Sun/Uranus/Eris, Vesta, Jupiter/Moon and Pluto/Juno which signifies the peak point of planetary tension before its gets finally resolved as a result of the intervention of the Light forces:
We will be doing this meditation at the exact moment of the Full Moon on Tuesday, April 11th at 08:08 am Central European Time (CEST). This equals 2:08 pm CST in Taipei, 8:08 am EET in Cairo, 8:08 am EET in Palmyra, 7:08 am BST in London, 2:08 am EDT in New York, 1:08 am CDT in Chicago, 0:08 am MDT in Denver and 11:08 pm PDT in Los Angeles on Monday, April 10th.
You can check the time of the meditation for your time zone here:
1. Use your own technique to bring you to a relaxed state of consciousness.
2. State your intent to use this meditation as a tool to speed up the process of bringing peace for planet Earth and its inhabitants.
3. Visualize a pillar of Light emanating from the Galactic Central Sun, then going through all beings of Light inside our Solar System and then through your body to the center of the Earth. Visualize another pillar of Light rising from the center of the Earth, then up through your body and upwards into the sky towards all beings of Light in our Solar System and our galaxy. You are now sitting in two pillars of Light, the Light flowing both upwards and downwards simultaneously. Keep these pillars of Light active for a few minutes.
4. Now visualize a violet flame purifying the Syria vortex and its energy field on plasma, etheric and astral planes. Then visualize this violet flame expanding through all Middle East and purifying it. Then expand it even more until it encompasses the whole planet, purifying its energy field on the plasma, etheric and astral planes.
5. Now visualize a soft pink healing divine feminine energy, healing all people in Syria and bringing peace to the country. Visualize this soft pink light protecting Palmyra. Visualize this divine feminine energy healing the minds and hearts of all people worldwide involved in the Syria conflict. Then visualize this divine feminine energy expanding through all Middle East and healing all people there. Then expand it even more until it encompasses the whole planet, healing all living beings on the planet.
In this exclusive ExoNews TV interview series we hear directly from William Tompkins’ about his work for U.S. Naval Intelligence during the Second World War. He reveals that he was directly involved in debriefings by Navy Spies embedded in Nazi Germany’s most advanced aerospace projects – some of which involved antigravity flying saucers that were capable of space flight.
Tompkins job was to design intelligence briefing packets based on the Navy spies debriefings, and to then deliver these packages to leading U.S. aerospace corporations, think tanks and universities for study and evaluation.
Tompkins describes how from 1942 to 1945, he participated in over a thousand debriefings of U.S. Navy spies, who had been embedded in leading Nazi Germany aerospace corporations involved in building flying saucers. Disseminating this vital intelligence information to various U.S. aerospace corporations and universities was Tompkins primary responsibility.
Tompkins said that he served under Admiral Rick Obatta who was in charge of intelligence operations out of the Naval Air Station at San Diego, and three Navy captains who were specialists in different areas of Naval aircraft design, engineering, and procurement. In the interview, he describes some of the circumstances of the debriefings that he participated in.
The following interview extract features Tompkins answering questions from Dr. Robert Wood and I on the information he gained from the Navy operatives, the different corporations and thinks tanks he travelled to, and some of the aerospace technologies that were being secretly developed by the Nazis during the War.
Tompkins begins the interview by describing the small office where the debriefings of the Navy spies took place at Naval Air Station, San Diego.
What follows is the full transcript of William Tompkins responding to questions on the first ExoNews TV episode (see above) presenting his testimony.
[For full introductory comments to interview click here]
MS: The following interview extract features [William] Tompkins answering questions from Dr. Robert Wood and I on the information he gained from the Navy operatives, the different corporations and thinks tanks he traveled to, and some of the aerospace technologies that were being secretly developed by the Nazis during the War. Tompkins begins the interview by describing the small office where the debriefings of the Navy spies took place at Naval Air Station, San Diego.
WT – We had this little small office. He [Rick Obatta] was commander of Naval Air Station, San Diego and so the admiral would be sitting here. I’m sitting next to him and one of my three captain bosses sitting here. A typist was sitting at the other side of the table and the Navy operative – a Lieutenant Commander or Lieutenant would sit over there. And he would lay out the information [with] some sketches, very few photographs, so it was almost all verbal, almost all. And if it was a system that we had already known about, other operatives from the information two years before, and it was an update of it, he would tie together all of the other organizations that were tied with that specific part, of say the cigar shaped vehicles, what the weapons were, what the operations were, the different companies underneath the ground, which were slave labor organizations.
RW – I want to go back to this table where you and Rick [Obatta], the Captain and the Navy spies, sitting at this table, how many times did you get exposed to incidents like that. Was it ten or was it a thousand, like a hundred? It was four years right?
WT – I’d say a thousand, maybe 1200.
RW – Well that would be like every night for four years.
WT – Yes, it was like …
RW – Was it a nightly thing, typically occur day after day?
WT – They [Navy operatives] would stay with us for maybe a week, and we tried to put together, better define his information, OK. Then we’d put that together as a package and we’d fly that out.
RW – So it would usually be one source would give his story, it might take two or three days for him to give his story, and it would be packaged up, and then you would take it away.
WT – I’d say this continued …
RW – What I’m trying to do is grasp the overall scope of those say three or four hundred deliveries you’d make, and some of the stuff had to do with Nazi history. Did some of the scope have to with, for example, age regression, Nazi age regression, as well as Nazi UFOs?
WT – Most of it was Nazi UFOs
RW – I’m talking about what the Nazis were doing in a military mode.
WT – Yes, it went to weapons systems, all types of advanced weapons systems, all types of methods of war.
RW – Did you get exposed to the Hanebu craft designs, or anything like that during that time?
WT – I was involved in making sketches of some of the stuff that was actually there.
MS – Did you ever come across the term ‘Hanebu’ as a description for various models of German antigravity vehicles?
WT – No.
MS – What about Vril? Did you ever come across Vril as a designation, Vril 1, Vril 2 …
WT – Yes, but remember the stuff that we got … the wording was in English, some of the documents that we got were of course in German. But we didn’t get so much of the documents. It was mostly verbal, and it was saying, in his interpretation, that was another thing, because we had one of the guys to go check so and so, “I want you back over there, and I want you back here next month.” Then there’s updates to the information.
And so some of the stuff that was in German, we had another group of people convert it into English. So you are working with information that you don’t have background on, and so what you are trying to do is put enough of it together so that [for example] Lockheed could take that information, and develop it, interpret it and come up with something that could possibly be used.
When I said that many, remember that I went back to these facilities, sometimes six or seven times with updated information that we got. Because three years after they said it before, we got things now, it’s been developed. Now it’s this, this and this.
RW – So do you remember what kind of material you took to different places, JPL or Caltech as it was called then? At JPL would you take the material relevant to UFO craft or antigravity craft?
WT – Everything about propulsion, the different types of propulsion and the stuff, I had no idea what this was… Then controls, different types of controls, support systems. Almost any subject, any question you wanted to ask. Some of that information we were getting.
RW – Some of the groups didn’t get everything.
WT – No.
RW – So if there were six locations, Douglas, Caltech, MIT, is that right?
WT – Yes.
RW – And then Lockheed?
WT – Lockheed, Boeing, North American, Northrup, North American.
RW – So there were seven or eight different locations that you made deliveries to?
WT – No, it’s hundreds of different places we took the data. We took the data to every Navy Research organization. We took it to Navy Development Center, Warminster, Pennsylvannia. OK. That’s a big facility. I bet I went 20 times back there with stuff. The Caltech one, I didn’t even go to Pasadena for that. I went to the Navy’s weapons system at China Lake because Caltech was working on other programs there. They would pull their scientists off, whatever that was, and throw these guys into a package, and run with the ball…
Some of them that I went to, they wouldn’t let me disseminate the information, they were not interested. They didn’t want to have a thing to do with it. And I had that with several universities who were doing military programs.
RW: Was Purdue one of them?
WT – Yes, Purdue was one…. What I’m saying is that not everyone was willing to help the Navy.
MS – What about the Air Force? Like Wright Patterson?
WT – Yes, Wright Patterson … A couple of the admirals didn’t want that, but we had our list of who we thought could help. The point is that these went not document after document you gave them. You gave them information that was verbal almost, very little photographs, very little drawings of a specific part of the propulsion, or a method of control … of these things.
RW – Technical things.
WT – All technical stuff. I don’t mind talking about this because frankly I lived that thing for four years. It was staggering. The German titles or stuff was a problem, so we had interpreters there that would help us put the packages together to say to take to Douglas, OK? And so there’s the misinterpretations and stuff, that I’m right. All that’s part of it. You don’t get some nice good package, and so packages were taken to places that were insufficient information. So they would get all … upset with me. I’ve got to go get this and that.
RW – Even though you were not trained technically as an engineer or a scientist, you were exposed to technical information in this process. It’s usually put in terms of common language and common sense. So you understood it?
WT – I understood some of it. Some of it I had no idea what he was talking about, and I have to tell him that, you know.
END TRANSCRIPT
William Tompkins autobiography, Selected by Extraterrestrials, is available at Amazon.com
Michael Salla’s Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Life is also available at Amazon.com
William Tompkin’s autobiography. Selected by Extraterrestrials is available at Amazon.com.
The answer to whether or not we are alone in the universe could be right under our nose, or, more literally, inside every cell in our body.
Could our genes have an intelligently designed “manufacturer’s stamp” inside them, written eons ago elsewhere in our galaxy? Such a “designer label” would be an indelible stamp of a master extraterrestrial civilization that preceded us by many millions or billions of years. As their ultimate legacy, they recast the Milky Way in their own biological image.
Vladimir I. shCherbak of al-Farabi Kazakh National University of Kazakhstan, and Maxim A. Makukov of the Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute, hypothesize that an intelligent signal embedded in our genetic code would be a mathematical and semantic message that cannot be accounted for by Darwinian evolution. They call it “biological SETI.” What’s more, they argue that the scheme has much greater longevity and chance of detecting E.T. than a transient extraterrestrial radio transmission.
Writing in the journal Icarus, they assert: “Once fixed, the code might stay unchanged over cosmological timescales; in fact, it is the most durable construct known. Therefore it represents an exceptionally reliable storage for an intelligent signature. Once the genome is appropriately rewritten the new code with a signature will stay frozen in the cell and its progeny, which might then be delivered through space and time.”
To pass the designer label test, any patterns in the genetic code must be highly statistically significant and possess intelligent-like features that are inconsistent with any natural know process, say the authors.
They go on to argue that their detailed analysis that the human genome (map here) displays a thorough precision-type orderliness in the mapping between DNA’s nucleotides and amino acids. “Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language.” They say this includes the use of decimal notation, logical transformations, and the use of the abstract symbol of zero. “Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing,” they assert.
This interpretation leads them to a farfetched conclusion: that the genetic code, “appears that it was invented outside the solar system already several billions years ago.” This statement endorses the idea of panspermia, the hypothesis that Earth was seeded with interstellar life. It’s certainly a novel and bold approach to galaxy conquest if we imagine this was a deliberate Johnny Appleseed endeavor by super-beings.
However, there are other possibilities too. I’ve previously written about the far-out notion that the universe we observe was built just for us and exists inside a computer program (with apologies toThe Matrix film trilogy). Therefore the idea that some programmer somewhere wrote the genetic code for life in their model universe is consistent with the authors’ suggestions.
Biological SETI inevitably smacks head-on into an idea that is completely antithetical to science: the concept of intelligent design (ID). The proposition of ID is that our biology is so complex it must have been engineered by a higher power.
Can the claim of an alien signature in our genetic code be any more believable, or provable than biblical ID?
We know so little about the origin of life on Earth it seems presumptive to identify genetic structure that supposedly defies a natural explanation. Even the discovery of life elsewhere in the solar system would not provide an independent test of this idea. Panspermia could have naturally occurred among the planets and moons.
And, even if the genetic code is ultimately considered the handprint of an extraterrestrial grand designer, then who designed the designer?
Scientists from the University of Buckingham have released a picture of an extraterrestrial from deep space that is bombarding the Earth. No, it’s not part of an extraterrestrial invasion. Rather, it is evidence supporting the theory of panspermia, in which microscopic life forms exist in the vacuum of space, and can seed life by arriving in great numbers on habitable planets like the Earth.
A team of scientists, including Professor Milton Wainwright, from the University of Buckingham Centre for Astrobiology, have conducted scientific tests in the stratosphere. These show that organisms not found on the Earth are arriving from outer space.
Professor Wainwright claims the results prove that life exists outside the Earth. In an interview with Britain’s Express newspaper, he said:
Our team has caused quite a stir over the last couple of two years by claiming these microbes are continually arriving to Earth from space. Our critics have been vocal in dismissing our work but, as yet, no one has provided a viable alternative explanation for our peer reviewed work…. As far as we can tell the particle has no relation to anything found on Earth.
In addition to the microbial life arriving from outer space, Professor Wainwright also revealed that heavy elements were found in the stratosphere. This suggests that these are extraterrestrial arrivals, as well, rather than material being carried up into the stratosphere by winds:
This latest launch is also exciting because the team has found particles containing, so-called, rare earth elements at a height close to 30 kilometres in the stratosphere. These particle masses are too big to have been carried up from Earth and, like the alien life forms we find, must be incoming to Earth from space.
The pictures of extraterrestrial microbes released by Wainwright’s scientific team supports an earlier finding by Russian scientists.
On Aug 19, 2014, ITAR-TASS reported that Russian scientists had found microbial life, similar to sea plankton, on the surface of the International Space Station (ISS). The Russians first detected the microbes over a year earlier and confirmed that these organisms can live in zero gravity within the extremely low temperatures and cosmic radiation. Despite the harsh conditions, the scientists reported that the bacteria were thriving on the surface of ISS and could live there for years.
The Russian discovery is startling since it confirms that extraterrestrial microbes can flourish in deep space. Vladimir Solovyev, chief of the Russian ISS orbital mission said:
Results of the experiment are absolutely unique. We have found traces of sea plankton and microscopic particles on the illuminator surface. This should be studied further.
NASA’s reaction to the startling Russian discovery was silence. This lack of reaction supports the claims of Richard Hoover, a veteran 46 year NASA astrobiologist, who says the civilian U.S. space agency is willfully ignoring clear evidence of extraterrestrial life.
The findings of the University of Buckingham scientists, along with the earlier Russian discovery of a form of sea plankton growing on ISS windows, is powerful evidence that microbial extraterrestrial life is very common throughout our solar system and the galaxy.
The picture of a microscopic space organism arriving on Earth may not be quite what people were expecting for their first glimpse of an extraterrestrial visitor. If these tiny space visitors have been arriving for a very long time – as panspermia advocates suggest – who else might be arriving that is awaiting the right scientific detection tools to discover them?
Scientists have further narrowed the search for a hypothetical particle that could be dark matter, the mysterious stuff that makes up 80 percent of all the mass in the universe. This video from NASA Astrophysics presents the new results, compiled from two years' worth of data from NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope.
Gamma rays are very energetic light, and the telescope looks for faint gamma-ray signals that are generated by a variety of sources, such as gas and dust spiraling into supermassive black holes or exploding stars. But another potential source of gamma rays is dark matter. Although no one is sure what dark matter is, one of the leading candidates is a yet-to-be-discovered particle called a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP). When two of these WIMPs meet, the theory goes, they can annihilate one another and generate gamma rays.
There are many possible versions of WIMPs, and they're expected to span a wide range of masses, producing a range of gamma rays with different energies. Using Fermi, the scientists focused on 10 small galaxies that orbit the Milky Way, searching for gamma-ray signals within a specific range of energies. They found no signs of annihilating WIMPs, which rules out certain kinds of WIMPs as dark-matter candidates.
an interferometry
project dedicated to SETI and radio astronomy
in Hat Creek,
California, at sunset.
Before we can understand an alien
civilization, it might be useful to understand our own.
To help in this task, anthropologist Kathryn Denning of York
University in Toronto, Canada studies the very human way that
scientists, engineers and members of the public think about space
exploration and the search for alien life.
From Star Trek to SETI, our modern world is constantly imagining
possible futures where we dart around the galaxy engaging with
bizarre alien races. Denning points out that when people talk about
these futures, they often invoke the past. But they frequently seem
to have a poor understanding of history.
For instance, in September at the
100 Year Starship Conference - a
symposium created by
DARPA for thinking about long-term spaceflight
goals - Denning noted that the conference was framed as an extension
of old traditions of exploration, for example mentioning Ferdinand
Magellan as an exemplary hero who circumnavigated the globe.
Not
only did Magellan not circumnavigate the globe (he was dismembered
in the Philippines before finishing the task), his mission was not
entirely laudable.
“It’s easy to forget that it’s also a story of slavery, war,
betrayal, hardship, violence, and death - not just to those who
signed up for the journey, but a lot of innocent bystanders,”
Denning said during a talk March 30 at the
Contact Conference, an
annual meeting dedicated to speculation about SETI and space
exploration.
The misuse of the past matters when thinking about the
future, she added, because it deludes people, giving them a poor
understanding of how history actually moves.
Wired spoke to Denning about
contact with extraterrestrials, the
rhetoric of the Space Age, and what it means to be human in the
universe.
Anthropologist Kathryn Denning
studies the very human way that
scientists, engineers, and members of the public
think about space
exploration and the search for alien life.
Wired: What does the field of
anthropology bring to thinking about space exploration and
SETI?
Kathryn Denning: Anthropologists are good at looking at
discourses, and the stories that people tell to structure their
lives and their behavior.
So there are anthropologists working
on the discourse surrounding interstellar flight. And
anthropologists have always worked on the phenomenon of UFO
abductions and
aliens on Earth and that sort of stuff.
With respect to SETI, one of the main contributions is just
grounding all of that speculation about other civilizations in
actual physical data. In terms of civilization or civilizations,
we only have one example - Earth.
And there’s a lot of data here, which has been very poorly mined
so far. If people are drawing generalizations about
civilizations elsewhere in the universe that don’t even hold
here on Earth, then maybe we should throw them out.
Wired: What are some instances of wrong ideas about civilization
that get invoked in talking about extraterrestrials?
Denning: I think one good example is the variable of L, the
lifetime of civilizations, which dominates
the Drake equation.
[An estimate of the number of intelligent extraterrestrials that
could exist in our galaxy.]
The speculation on this has been frankly goofy sometimes. I mean
you can make up basically any value of L that you like and
justify it in some way. So people say we should try to use
Earth’s data to look at it. We should ask what really does cause
civilizations to collapse or revert to a lower order of
complexity or technological regime.
And, well, we’re still working that one out actually. We have so
much work to do and I think that’s important for people to
understand that our models of civilization here on Earth are not
as solid as popular culture frequently assumes them to be.
Similarly, many people hold outdated ideas regarding scenarios
of contact. We have our iconic case studies, such as Columbus
landing in the Americas or Cortez and the Aztecs. But most of
those have been revamped with additional historical work in even
just the last 30 or 40 years.
So when I hear that standard model of Columbus or Cortez,
frankly I want to roll my eyes.
For example [Steven]
Hawking
says - interminably and repeatedly - that when Columbus showed
up in the Americas, well, that didn’t turn out very well for the
Native Americans. And therefore we should similarly be worried
about trying to attract the attention of an alien civilization.
The problem is that it tends to misrepresent Earth’s history.
These stories get invoked in models of contact with an alien
society, but it’s a biased retelling of Earth’s history and it’s
usually not a very good one.
The underlying narrative there is that it went poorly for the
Native Americans because they were the inferior civilization.
And, by extension, it would go poorly for us because the other
party would be the superior civilization. But that simply wasn’t
the case for the Native Americans.
One of the reasons I do the work I do is to try and have people
get the history a little bit straighter.
Wired: There is an
oft-heard narrative for alien contact: after
we find a signal, it would revolutionize everything, and
humanity would put aside their differences and come together as
one. How do you take that narrative as an anthropologist?
Denning: One way to read that, in the most general sense, is
that it’s a narrative that makes us feel better.
One of the things that astronomy and space exploration in the
20th century has done is force us to confront the universe in a
way that we never did before. We had to start understanding
that, yeah, asteroids impact the earth and can wipe out a vast
proportion of life, and our planet is a fragile spaceship Earth.
I think this has given us this sort of kind of cosmic anxiety.
And it would make us feel a whole lot better if we had neighbors
and they were friendly and they could enlighten us.
One of the things that runs through the whole SETI discussion is
our problems with technology. There is an inherent assumption
that the equipment needed for communication across interstellar
space would necessarily evolve in tandem with weapons of mass
destruction.
Therefore any society that survived long enough to
make contact with us would have solved their technological
problems.
I think that’s a very hopeful take on it. These stories of
contact and what it would do for us, they’ve emerged in concert
with these anxieties about the universe and questions about our
technology.
I think in some way it’s almost like a coping
mechanism.
Wired: In terms of space exploration, you’ve said that it’s like
we’re entering a new Space Age. Why do you say that and what
does it mean?
Denning: I think the biggest difference from the past is the
role of corporations. Obviously nation-states have always used
contractors, but they’re now achieving a degree of independence
that is unprecedented.
When you have private companies that are planning on flying not
just to the moon but
also to Mars, that’s new and that’s
different. We don’t have the government systems in place to deal
with that sort of stuff because the outer space treaty and all
our international agreements are geared toward nation states.
There are new legal discourses emerging but nothing moves as
fast as private enterprise. It’s been specifically set up to
move quickly, so nothing moves as fast as, say,
the X prize.
Wired: The 1950s/60s Space Age often invoked the rhetoric of
colonization or frontierism in thinking about their goals. How
do these ideas play out in modern space exploration?
Denning: The ideological stages of colonization are still well
underway. As soon as you have technology on another world, that
constitutes a de facto claim of some kind.
So, in a way,
everyone watching
Spirit and Opportunity are watching Mars
through these robot’s eyes.
That’s not just an interesting kind of little jaunt; it’s a way
of making Mars not only human but also American. When you’re
naming features on other worlds after people here, these things
constitute claims.
For example,
NASA renamed the Mars Pathfinder lander the “Carl
Sagan Memorial Station.” Any archeologist or anthropologist will
tell you that one of the most effective ways of colonizing
territory, at least ideologically, is through your dead.
Wired: Is there something you’d like to see as the narrative of
the new Space Age?
Denning: I’m going to borrow a term here from a scholar named
Bill Kramer. He spoke at the 100-Year Starship Conference and he
suggested that instead of boldly going, we humbly go.
To me that really encapsulates it.
Instead of getting out there
as quickly as possible and using the systems that we used here
on Earth, like extracting resources as quickly as possible in
order to fuel whatever it is that we’re trying to do.
What if we
went instead with a collaborative, conservationist stewardship
in mind?
What if instead of making messes that we don’t know how to clean
up, what if we slowed down a little bit? Because the urgency is
manufactured.
I mean, I want to see space continue to be
explored. It’s cool, and there’s stuff out there that we would
like to know.
It doesn’t have to be the answer to all of our needs. Sure, we
can harvest sunlight from solar arrays in orbit around the Earth
but that’s going to have its own technological problems and
geopolitical implications.
But the main problem with energy and resources here on Earth
isn’t always that we don’t have enough: it’s that the
distribution is unequal, and simply harvesting more is not going
to resolve that. Chances are it’s just going to continue to
increase inequity, and that doesn’t work well for anyone.
I think what everybody should be learning is that these immense
disparities cause profound instabilities, which you have to
continue to have to deal with. So I just don’t see it as the
answer.
Space colonization is held up as being the natural next stage in
our social evolution. Not only that, it’s an absolute necessity
for the survival of the species. But if we are our own
existential threat, then how does that follow? Wherever we go,
there we are.
So the suggestion that ever increasing technology is the
solution to problems that have been created by our technology is
barking mad.
Wired: In some sense, we have a deterministic view of history
when it comes to space exploration: We will go from airplanes to
spaceships to conquering the galaxy. Where does that narrative
come from and what do you see as some of the downsides of it?
Denning: I think it comes from two places. One is a specific
version of history that’s quite progressivist and techno-philic.
It’s a version of history that says we just increase in our
energy consumption, we increase in our complexity and we
increase our goodness. It all ratchets up together, and it’s a
kind of
Singularity argument.
But it’s combined with this fundamentally apocalyptic view that
the current order of things will one day be superseded by
another. That’s kind of a Judeo-Christian thing. And it’s sort
of a funny coincidence that the future is up there [points
skyward]. In many popular space narratives, the heavens and
Heaven really swap out. It sounds pretty glib but it’s so
frequently suggested that it’s hard to dismiss.
The idea is that longevity - immortality, in fact - the future
and our destiny are all up there. And there’s simply no logical
reason that should be the case. We have no evidence suggesting
we can live anywhere for long periods of time other than on this
planet. In fact, the evidence is steadily accumulating that’s
it’s going to be really hard to do anything else.
We have problems with bone loss and
blindness. Plus we have no
evidence that we can reproduce safely in space. These are fairly
big stumbling blocks and so this vision of a happy shiny future
in space, it’s just so mythic.
Wired: Do you see that as changing, do you think people are
coming to understand the problems with the previous narratives?
Denning: I think some are and this is one of the glories of
humanity. But we’ll always have a tremendous diversity of
opinion.
You’re always going to have these people who think Heaven and
the heavens are interchangeable. And they’re going to be looking
toward the stars for all kinds of religious or quasi-religious
purposes.
Then you’re going to have the extension of the planetary
protection mode of thinking. The people who are fundamentally
thinking about environmentalism and stewardship and inequity.
And then you’re going to have the people interested in
militarization, and so on.
You’re always going to have this diversity of viewpoints, of
motivations, and behaviors, and I mean: Welcome to Earth.
Wired: You write in a paper (Ten
Thousand Revolutions - Conjectures About Civilizations) that someone in “the physical
sciences might say ‘aha, here you have X which, by analogy,
means that you must have Y, which means you have Z.’” On the
other hand, “a scholar in the human sciences will often not
venture past X.”
Denning: Right, we rarely get as far as Z. Most of the time,
anthropology is not working as explicitly with a predictive
model, it’s a much more descriptive model.
Wired: How do you see that difference between the physical and
social sciences play out in the SETI discourse?
Denning: I think there’s been a lot of interesting discussion
around the question of whether or not decipherment of an
extraterrestrial signal would be possible.
Anthropologists tend to assume the answer is, basically, no.
Unless you’re in direct contact, it would be very difficult to
establish enough common language. Whereas the physicists and
mathematicians tend to say, ‘Well all you need is math.’
And then the anthropologists laugh and it goes on. Maybe that
tells you more about the various disciplines than about whether
or not contact is possible, but that’s an entertaining and
interesting problem.
Wired: What do anthropologists say when they look at the
enterprise of SETI? That is, what does it say about us as humans
that we are searching for others like ourselves in the universe?
Denning: It’s an interesting question and you can look at it in
different ways. In one sense, its just the extension of a long
tradition on thinking about what might be out there, which has
just gone through a new technological manifestation.
Some people ask me: When did we first start thinking that there
might be extraterrestrial life? And my reply is: When did we
start thinking that there might not be?
The sky has always been very busy, and the default position has always been that it’s
populated. That doesn’t mean anything but that ideological
substrate has always been there.
Only 200 years ago, we thought there could be people on the
moon.
Then, we got a good look at the moon and saw, well there’s
no Lunarians there. And then there were the Martians - Lowell
and all that - and it wasn’t very long ago, less than 100 years
ago. As our range of vision keeps on moving outwards, the aliens
keep on moving outwards too. And that’s one way you can look at
SETI; it’s the logical trajectory of an idea that’s always been
around.
And, of course, you can look at it within
a religious framework.
Our 20th century western culture includes Christianity and
beings populating the Heavens. But anthropologically speaking, SETI also could be seen as being a reaction to the collapse of
traditional religion.
In a universe where you’re no longer expecting God to provide
the order, we are forced to ask: where is the order? Where’s the
sense to it all and what are we then a part of?
The revelations of our energetic Universe keep on coming from many sources, including NASA’s new satellites, and it’s quite remarkable.
The observable Universe is something mankind has read as a language since the beginning. The unobservable worlds have always been the realm of philosophers, religious expressions and the esoteric sciences.
Are they coming together via modern technology, as we approach the Singularity as some call it, as a manifestation of some sort of consciousness shift?
I think so.
The video below was sent to me by a dear friend at Philosophers Stone in confirmation of my last post on this subject. It so blew my mind I wanted to get it out there as a sequel of sorts and to reinforce the above.
Scientists In Awe
More information being collected by higher and higher technology is making some seriously profound discoveries.
NASA’s Fermi Gamma-Ray Telescope is finding hundreds of new objects at the very edge of the electromagnetic spectrum. Many of them have one thing in common: Astronomers have no idea what they are. – NASA comment on the video
The beauty of this is the scientific community’s own sense of awe as they’re no doubt realizing the old way of viewing the Universe has got to change. And, that we have a lot to learn about our energetic source.
That’s a good thing.
Let’s hope it stays refreshing and not the canned suppression of information we’re used to.
In Their Own Words
The statements in this recent NASA video I find refreshing. While again it’s a carefully produced item for public consumption from a tightly controlled operation, when you realize what they are talking about and trying to describe is fundamentally the creative, energetic workings of our amazing Universe that can only lead to more Truth, that’s cool!
Especially in light of the vibrational change we’re going through.
“Fermi is picking up crazy-energetic photons” says Dave Thompson, an astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. “And it’s detecting so many of them we’ve been able to produce the first all-sky map of the very-high energy Universe.”
The gamma rays Fermi detects are billions of times more energetic than visible light. He goes on to say that science only knew of 4 sources of gamma rays before, and now they’ve found over 600 news ones…a third of which they have no idea what they are! That’s huge!
Massive Fermi bubbles at the center of the Milky Way…never before detected.
New Structures Discovered
Some of these gamma-ray photon emitting sources are known. Super massive black holes called Blazars, “the seething remnants of supernova explosions”, and rapidly rotating neutron stars called pulsars, so they say.
And some come from the giant structures emanating from the Milky Way’s center called “Fermi bubbles”. These are amazing. Sci-fi can’t hold a candle to reality. They span some 20,000 light years above and below the galactic plane. You want big and powerful? And what are they?
No one in the mainstream seems to know. Or is at liberty to tell us.
Gamma Rays – Heralds of Great Energy
This is another scientific post that says some powerful things about gamma rays.
Gamma rays are by their very nature heralds of great energy and violence. They are a super-energetic form of light produced by sources such as black holes and massive exploding stars. Gamma-rays are so energetic that ordinary lenses and mirrors do not work. As a result, gamma-ray telescopes can’t always get a sharp enough focus to determine exactly where the sources are.
For two thirds of the new catalog’s sources the Fermi scientists can, with at least reasonable certainty, locate a known gamma ray-producing object*, such as a pulsar or Blazar, in the vicinity the gamma-rays are coming from. But the remaining third – the “mystery sources” — have the researchers stumped, at least for now. And they are the most tantalizing.
Nearly 600 sources in the latest Fermi catalog are unidentified.
“Some of the mystery sources could be clouds of dark matter – something that’s never been seen before,” speculates Thompson.
About 85% of the gravitational mass of the universe is dark matter. The stuff we see makes up the rest. Dark matter is something that pulls on things with the force of its gravity but can’t be detected in any other way. It doesn’t shine – doesn’t emit or scatter light – hence the adjective “dark.” Source
It’s All About Conscious Awakening
All of humanity is being presented with this energetic shift to either embrace willingly or vainly try to resist. The more discoveries like these, and the growing revelations in other areas regarding our true origins, the manipulation of humanity, the shift from ideology and hiearchy, the inter-connectivity of consciousness etc., the better.
But scientific validation always goes over big with left-brain reinforced humans. So I’m all for using everything we’ve got.
We’re all in this together so let’s all help each other wake up any way we can!
The truth vibrations, the cosmic awakening, whatever you want to call it, the energy is being dialed up in more ways than we can imagine and it’s wonderful!
My advice is to live a conscious life. Respond to these new prompts you’re getting and revel in your new found sense of conscious freedom. Look for it everywhere you turn and follow its lead.
Amazing things await each and every one of us but you will need to make some changes and let go of the old, however you’re led. And another good thing? As we each unplug from the matrix, the current oppressive structure will just naturally fall.
(David Icke has been talking about what he has called the 'Truth Vibrations' for two decades - an energetic (information) change that he said would waken humanity from its hypnotic slumber and reveal all that has been hidden from us - especially the global Control System.
David has also said that the electromagnetic spectrum and the speed of light are basically a fake reality, or Matrix, technologically-generated to enslave humanity in a false sense of self, the 'world' and reality in general.
David says that the speed of light is not the fastest speed possible, as Einstein suggested and science continues to believe. It is the outer frequency range of the fake reality and 'true' reality exists beyond its vibrational walls. Those walls are now being breached by David's 'Truth Vibrations'.
He says that the supposed 'laws of physics' are the laws of the Matrix energy fields, not the greater reality beyond its vibrational prison bars.)
'The picture is the first full-sky image from Europe's Planck telescope which was sent into space last year to survey the "oldest light" in the cosmos. It took the 600m-euro observatory just over six months to assemble the map.
It shows what is visible beyond the Earth to instruments that are sensitive to light at very long wavelengths - much longer than what we can sense with our eyes. Researchers say it is a remarkable dataset that will help them understand better how the Universe came to look the way it does now.'
Mysteriously, four spacecraft that flew past Earth have each displayed unexpected anomalies in their motions.
These newfound enigmas join the so-called "Pioneer anomaly" as hints that unexplained forces may appear to act on spacecraft.
A decade ago, after rigorous analyses, anomalies were seen with the identical Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they hurtled out of the solar system. Both seemed to experience a tiny but unexplained constant acceleration toward the sun.
A host of explanations have been bandied about for the Pioneer anomaly. At times these are rooted in conventional science — perhaps leaks from the spacecraft have affected their trajectories. At times these are rooted in more speculative physics — maybe thelaw of gravity itself needs to be modified.
Now Jet Propulsion Laboratory astronomer John Anderson and his colleagues — who originally helped uncover the Pioneer anomaly — have discovered that five spacecraft each raced either a tiny bit faster or slower than expected when they flew past Earth en route to other parts of the solar system.
‘Humble and perplexed’
The researchers looked at five deep-space probes — Galileo to Jupiter, the NEAR mission to the asteroid Eros, the Rosetta probe to a comet, Cassini to Saturn and the Messenger craft to Mercury. Each spacecraft flew past our planet to either gain or lose orbital energy in their quests to reach their eventual targets. (Galileo made two flybys.)
The scientists confirmed anomalies in five of the six flybys, involving four of the five spacecraft.
"I am feeling both humble and perplexed by this," said Anderson, who is now working on the anomaly as a retiree. "There is something very strange going on with spacecraft motions. We have no convincing explanation for either the Pioneer anomaly or the flyby anomaly."
The essential structure and dynamics of the Exopolitics Model – that the Universe is populated by intelligent civilizations, organized under governing bodies and operating according to law – is preliminarily confirmed by replicable scientific remote viewing data developed during the 1990s.
Data from scientific remote viewers suggest that a spiritually and technologically advanced Galactic Federationof worlds exists. It can be described as a sort of loosely organized spiritual government of our Milky Way galaxy.
This is a transcript of a scientific remote viewing session with a Galactic Federation leader:
Remote Viewer: “As soon as I went into his mind [a Galactic Federation leader], I reemerged in space. That is where I am now. I am outside of the Milky Way, looking onto it. Dotted lines have been drawn over the image, dividing up the galaxy-like quadrants.
“I am being told that there is a need for help. They need us. I am getting the sense that they need us in a galactic sense, but I seem to be resisting this. They are so much more powerful than humans; it just does not make sense why they would need us.
“The leader is sensing my resistance and redirecting me to a planet. OK, I can see it is Earth. I am being told that there will be a movement off the planet in the future for humans. I am just translating the gestalts now into words. But the sense clearly is that Earth humans are violent and troublesome currently. They need shaping before a later merger. Definitely humans need to undergo some sort of change before extending far off the planet.”
Monitor: “Ask if there are any practical suggestions as to how we can help.”
Remote Viewer: “I am being told in no uncertain terms that I am to complete this book project. Others will play their parts. There are many involved. Many species representatives, groups.”
Monitor: “As who else we should meet using remote viewing, or another technique?”
Remote Viewer: “Only the Martians. Hmmm. I am being told that our near-term contact with extraterrestrials will be limited to the Martians for now, at least in the near future.”
Monitor: “Ask if there is new information that we need to know but do not know.”
Remote Viewer: “This fellow is very patient. He knows this is hard for me. He is telling me that many problems are coming. There definitely will be a planetary disaster, or perhaps I should say disasters. There will be political chaos, turbulence, an unraveling of the current political order. As we are currently, we are unable to cope with new realities. He is telling me very directly that consciousness must become a focal concern of humans in order for us to proceed further.
“He is right now tapping into your (my monitor’s) mind. It is like he is locating you, and perhaps measuring or doing something. He is telling me that you are very important in all of this. We must come back here – their world – at later dates. We will be the initial representatives of humans as determined by consciousness. He is telling me that consciousness determined our arrival point. There is more. We are not saviors, just initial representatives. He wants me to get this straight.
“I am getting the sense that he wants us to understand that we have a responsibility to represent fairly. This is not to go to our heads. This is just our job now, and we all have jobs. He is also telling me that I am doing a fairly good job at writing this down.
“He likes your sense of humor. He says that there will be lots of activity in the future, of the day-to-day sort. But for now, we are to focus on the book. The book is important, and they will use it.”
As the transcript of this fascinating scientific remote viewing session reveals, we are in the early stages of Exopolitical research.
Primary scientific databases for Exopolitical research and activity can be derived via the scientific method from a wide variety of sources, including at least the following formal categories of data:
Category A – Voluntary Conscious Physical Contactees with Off-Planet Cultures
Category B – Involuntary Semi-Conscious Physical Contactees (Abductees)
Category C – Voluntary Semi-Conscious Alter-Physical Contactees (Star People)
Category D – Voluntary Psychic Contactees (Channelers and Visionaries)
Category E – Neutral Psychic Contactees (Scientific Remote Viewers)
Category F – Whistle-Blowers from Inside the Secret Government
Category G – Documentary Evidence from Government and Official Sources
Category H – Superficial Excited Witnesses and Sightings Reports
Category I – Astute Debriefers, Debunkers, and Interpreters
Category J – Alien Artifacts
Category K – Independent Archeology, including Exo-Archaeology
"Consciousness shines in various external and internal forms. There is no existence of objects apart from consciousness. Therefore the world is simply a form of consciousness." (Shiva Sutra)
YOU ARE NOT ALONE
YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN ALONE
UNIVERSE
This painting is a metaphor for Mother Earth birthing a new world, in a new dimension.
Your planet was seeded by many, many races from across the cosmos. This universe and its galaxies are teaming with sentient, intelligent life, societies and cultures. People of planet Earth, you are part of this glorious expanse... of sentient intelligent life.
This site affirms the right to believe, not what we are told to believe, and not what we blindly consent to believe, but what we determine to be true and worth believing. It presents a way to undertake that “tedious and daunting task” by which we make ourselves accountable to truth itself.
A moving point generates a line
A moving line generates a plane
A moving plane generates a volume
A moving volume generates a hypervolume
The threshold movement is attained at the speed of light
At the speed of light mass becomes infinite and time ceases to be
A timeless, mass-less entity can travel to any point in the universe instantly
A timeless, mass-less entity can manifest to all points in the universe instantly
The mysterious aspect of a human, electromagnetic-ethereal, travels at or beyond the speed of light
A Huge Miles Long Tower Of The Moon
-
*https://youtu.be/5v2y5l4PFak?feature=shared*
This old satellite just detected a huge miles long tower after capturing HD
images of the Moon. This miles...
An open book on our origins
-
Originally, much was known about our origins, but these were destroyed by
the dark powers so that we were not allowed to know how, what and where our
ori...
CHILDREN OF THE FOREST (Chenchus)
-
https://youtu.be/dSe4UMTb6vI
This award-winning ethnographic documentary film made by Sathya Mohan PV,
deals with the socio-economic and religious life ...
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. MARGARET MEAD (Anthropologist)
NOBODY STANDS TALLER THAN THOSE WILLING TO STAND CORRECTED. (William Safire)
DISCLAIMER
I do not necessarily agree with or endorse all of the views presented here. We are all, in a sense, investigators of our world. And while we, as individuals, may not agree with everything presented here, I fully support freedom of thought and speech as well as the Quest for truth.
VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGIST
Sathya is an Independent Researcher and Web Publisher engaged in visually exploring and documenting the fast disappearing tribal traditions and the Great Tradition of India. His work seeks to reveal one society to another creating an environment for trans-cultural understanding in a world divided by xenophobia.
