Alien blood of Babylon

PART-1

PART-2

Bloodlines of the Illuminati

Worldwide Evil and Misery - The Legacy of the 13 Satanic Bloodlines

GOD KINGS - The Descendants of Jesus

ALIEN DNA - HOLY BLOODLINE HISTORY

Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World

The David Icke Guide to the Global Conspiracy 

And the Truth Shall Set You Free: The 21st Century Edition 

Human Race, Get Off Your Knees-The Lion Sleeps No More

The Lion Sleeps No More (Book Trailer)

Ruled By The Gods

David Icke - Ruled By The Gods - All 6 Parts.

The Biggest Secret

SATANISM IS REAL ...

... AND IT RUNS THE WORLD

'Frater 616' mentions a man with the Illuminati-Satanic code name of 'Pindar', who he had worshipped as 'the true father of the statutory heir'. 'Pindar' has  featured in my books going back to The Biggest Secret and he is a Satanist operating at the highest levels of the global cabal.

Satanism is run as a strict heirachy based on bloodline and the perceived 'power' of the demonic entities that the advocates allow to possess them. In many ways, the demonic heirachy is reflected in the 'human' heirachy of Satanism.

Satanists are vehicles for demonic entities (often reptilian in form) to manipulate human society. The rituals can also create an energetic 'doorway' or 'gateway' between vibrational realities that allow the entities to manifest in our world of 'visible light'.

I have spoken with a number of people over the years who have described how reptilian and other demonic entities manifested before them during rituals and how participants 'shifted' from human to reptilian form in the same energetic environment.

Satanism at its 'highest' levels is also designed through the rituals and the manipulation of energy to imprint its low-vibrational mind-patterns into the waveform fabric of our reality. As the 'death bed confession' document says: 'What most people do not realise is that Satanism is a ritually based practice and that this repetition has - over time - left strong impressions upon the Morphic Field!'

This is the 'sea' of energy (information) in which we all live and if you want to manipulate every fish at the same time, what do you do? You manipulate the sea.

TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE DAVID ICKE NEWSLETTER, GET IMMEDIATE ACCESS  TO HIS FANTASTIC NEWSLETTER LIBRARY ON A HOST OF SUBJECTS GOING BACK TO 2005, AND SEE HOURS OF VIDEO FOOTAGE OF DAVID'S INFORMATION, PLEASE CLICK HERE ...

Predator Mind

Global Conspiracy

CONSPIRACY THEORY…?

Denial of the reality of extraterrestrial life has been the unremitting policy of our national establishment since the early 1950s, despite the persistence of the UFO phenomenon and overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Few who have taken the time to examine this issue closely could dispute that our national leadership manages a massive cover-up or policy of ‘denial’ with regard to verified existence of UFOs/Extraterrestrials. The ‘official’ game is played something like this: UFOs don’t exist—never did. People who see them are ‘crazy’—and even if the ‘powers that be’ did know they were real, they wouldn’t tell us anyway! Policy generously funded by public tax dollars—thank you!
A discrete glimpse of our government’s fundamental attitude toward public disclosure of the reality of extraterrestrial life is openly stated in an official document published in 1960 by the Brookings Institution—a government ‘think-tank’–commissioned to examine the overall social impact of manned space missions which were scheduled for launch over the ensuing decade by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In the Brookings report titled, “Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs”, we find we find consideration that ultimately space missions might possibly confront extra-terrestrial life, and concern that the reality of such exposure could, in fact, precipitate the “disintegration” of our social structure through radical “changes in values, attitudes and behavior”.

The report explained that, “anthropological files contain many examples of societies, sure of their place in the universe, which have disintegrated when they had to associate with previously unfamiliar societies espousing different ideas and different life ways…”
The report also went on to single out two groups most vulnerable to negative impact of such a revelation, those being fundamentalist religions and the science community. The report concluded that to avoid devastating social change it might be useful to withhold disclosure of an ET reality from the public. This, of course, flies in the face of NASA’s stated policy that such a discovery should be promptly shared with all humanity.

This rationale for non-disclosure was further emphasized by former assistant the Executive Director of the CIA, Victor Marchetti in 1979; “We have indeed been contacted, perhaps even visited by extra-terrestrial beings, and the United States Government, in collusion with the other powers of Europe, is determined to keep this information from the general public. The purpose of this international conspiracy is to maintain a working stability between the nations of the world, and for them, in turn, to maintain institutional control over their respective populations. For these governments to admit that there are beings from outer space with mentalities and technological capabilities obviously far superior to ours, could, once fully perceived by the average person, erode the foundations of the Earth’s traditional power structures.”

(Quote from Above Top Secret by Timothy Good, published by William Morrow and Company, Inc. 1988.)

Marchetti’s statement is revealing. He candidly defines the UFO cover-up as an “international conspiracy” to protect “traditional power structures”. However, one must wonder if the rationale behind this international cover-up is intended to protect the ‘masters’ rather than the ‘masses’. Perhaps the imperative to keep the public at large ignorant of life beyond planet Earth goes deeper than the need to maintain economic and political stability between nations. Whose agenda is really served by such strident policies of non-disclosure? Does a ruling elite conceal a darker intent by imposing a shadowy veil of secrecy designed to hold the masses in ignorance, like cattle in a holding pen? Does the presence of extra-terrestrials pose a threat to the international power brokers who hold this planet firmly in their grasp with all of humanity as their hostages? Or do the power brokers themselves actually serve a carefully concealed agenda for diabolical alien invaders–an agenda that cleverly manipulates the “values, attitudes and behavior” of the masses to serve their own purposes?

British author/lecturer, David Icke, in his book The Robots’ Rebellion, (published by Gateway Books, 1994) outlines how human “values, attitudes and behavior” have been ‘engineered’ down through history by secret societies to serve a vast scheme of global dominion. In his book, Icke describes how a cabal of elite financiers and politicians is spinning a global web designed to entangle national politics, economics and the mass media into a single network for the purpose of coercing Western Civilization into accepting a monolithic, one-world state. The process is euphemistically referred to these days as ‘globalization’. He outlines how, like docile, compliant sheep the general public is being herded by the media, by economic pressures and by legislation into accepting the subjugation of the managing elite. The masses are being ‘stage-managed’ into accepting a fate they would otherwise fight to resist. A conspiracy of global proportions is dangerously close to achieving its grand climax.

Sound like fringe paranoia? If so, David Icke shares some esteemed company with names like Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln, for they too feared the machinations of the ‘unseen hand’.

The ‘stage-managing’ works something like this…

One of the imperative goals of the ‘one-world-order’ is the elimination of individual rights. Of course, should our government leaders openly make such an outrageous demand of the population, the masses would rise up in open rebellion. Therefore a scenario must be devised whereby the masses willingly relinquish their individual rights for their ‘protection’. The technique is called ‘problem-reaction-solution’. For instance—Problem– national leaders could stage a “Reichstag fire”, or blow up the battleship “Maine” and then proclaim the nation was under dire threat from vicious ‘terrorists’, Communists, Nazis, Muslims or Martians–whatever. Reaction—a terrified populace demands protection by its government. Solution—the government offers more protection to the people at the price of imposing more and more scrupulous surveillance. Deal! So naturally the masses happily surrender their privacy, for by doing so, their security is firmly guaranteed. And through the media the masses remain hounded relentlessly with the threat of more and more terrorist violence, from which they demand more and more protection. Solution achieved! Exactly what the powers-that-be had intended all along, and now the people are trapped, by a cunning manipulation of ‘values, attitudes, and behavior’, more tightly than ever in the iron grip of the ruling elite!

Pretty slick, huh?

“The existence of an accepted external menace, then, is essential to social cohesiveness as well as to the acceptance of political authority. The menace must be believable, it must be of a magnitude consistent with the complexity of the society threatened, and it must appear, at least, to affect the entire society.”

(Quote from, Report from Iron Mountain, Dell Publishing, 1967.)

Such techniques of ‘social engineering’ are not new. They’ve been used throughout human history and in many cases employed by ‘secret societies’, one of the most notorious of which was known as the ‘Illuminati’.

Around the time of the American and French Revolutions, secret societies were all the rage in Europe. It was deemed most stylish and fashionable amongst the privileged elite to seek membership with such groups, each one competing to be more secret and exclusive than the other.

In Bavaria, an enterprising Jesuit professor of cannon law, named Adam Weishaupt, concocted a secret organization culled from the elite of the Grand Orient Masonic Lodge, purported to be the most secret of all, and he called it the ‘Illuminati’. Soon earning a notorious reputation for its ambitious seditious intent, Bavarian authorities altogether banned the sect of ‘Illuminati’ from its borders. Undaunted, Weishaupt and ‘Illuminism’ disappeared underground and eventually spread throughout Europe. “The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in its own name, but always covered by another name, another occupation”, was Weishaupt’s directive. The avowed goal of the Illuminati was abolition of nationalism and the establishment of a one-world-state. Weishaupt’s motto was, “the end justifies the means.”

Almost one hundred years later an inflammatory document surfaced in Europe that was nothing less than a Machiavellian blueprint for world domination. Its title was The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion. Purported to be evidence of a Jewish plot to subjugate the world, this document fueled the fires of European anti-Semitism and persecution. Yet closer inspection suggests the ‘Protocols’ may have been an abridgement of a writing from “some Masonic organization or Masonically oriented secret society.”

Authors, Henry Lincoln, Richard Leigh and Michael Baigent in their book Holy Blood Holy Grail, describe the ‘Protocols’ as something out of a James Bond thriller—“a blueprint for nothing less than total world dominion.” The obvious Jewish references in the text were likely supplied to divert attention from its true authors. Yet some passages read as if originally penned by none other than Adam Weishaupt himself, for indeed they echo the stated ambitions of his…Illuminati.

Consider these excerpts from David Icke’s book “The Robots Rebellion”…

“…The Goyim are a flock of sheep and we are the wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock.”
Protocol 11

(The term, ‘Goyim’, means cattle, or in this context a derogatory reference to the unsuspecting masses.)

“We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community.”

Protocol 5

“In order to give the Goyim no time to think and take note their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain…that is gold, which they will erect into a veritable cult, for the sake of those material delights which it can give…”

Protocol 4

“It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the Goyim the very principle of the Godhead and the spirit and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.”

Protocol 4

“We must bring (public opinion) into such a state of bewilderment by giving expression to all sides of so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the Goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political.”

Protocol 5

“What is the part played by the Press today? It serves to excite and inflame those passions which are needed by our purpose or else serves selfish ends of parties. It is vapid, unjust, mendacious, and the majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the Press really serves…”

Protocol 12

“…that so-called Great Power—the Press, which, with few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands.”

Protocol 7

“…We shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain…then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishments of our plans…a puppet in our hands.”

Protocol 10

“There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative…we must so direct the education of Goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence.”

Protocol 5

“…in order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces…competitions in art, in sports of all kinds…these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we would find ourselves compelled to oppose them.”

Protocol 13

“…In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they well know that we have the power to whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order…In the second place, by our intrigues, we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all states by means of politics, by economic treaties, or loan obligations.”

Protocol 7

“The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the constitution…when the people, utterly wearied by irregularities and incompetence—a matter we will arrange for—will clamor: away with them and give us one king over all the Earth who will annihilate the causes of discords—frontiers, nationalities, religions, state debts—who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.”

Protocol 10

“…to attain a serious end it behooves not to stop at any means or count the victims sacrificed for the sake of that end…”

Protocol 15

These excerpts are, of course, but a mere sampling of a far more lengthy text that details manipulation of governments, the press, public education and national economies, all of which echo Adam Weishaupt’s haunting imperative, “the end justifies the means.” Are these ‘Protocols’ the rambling rantings of an obsessed madman? Or are they the framework of an incredible plot perpetuated over innumerable generations by individuals meticulously screened through degrees of initiation in secret brotherhoods, bound by blood oaths and all dedicated to accomplishing the “great work of the ages”—the establishment of a monolithic, one-world order? Adam Weishaupt is dead and has been for 200 years, yet the fulfillment of his ambitions and those of the ‘Protocols’ can be witnessed with chilling reality each evening on CNN.

It must be carefully noted, it is not the intention of this commentary to defame any group or religion. Who authored these ‘Protocols’ is not at issue here. Whether it was indeed written by Zionists, Freemasons, the Vatican or a raving lunatic is of little importance. What interests us here is, who implements these directives today…and why?
Does all this Machiavellian population stage-managing serve only a handful of super-rich international financiers merely so they can own fancier yachts or live in grander mansions? Or have generations of the human population existed to be nothing more than hybrid cattle, mindlessly entertained by a never-ending cavalcade of political contests, Super-Bowls, Disneylands, shopping malls and perpetual wars, to distract them from the truth that they are entrapped in a prison covertly engineered by masters not of this Earth?

Does a clever cabal of secret societies, whose roots reach back to the Mystery Schools of ancient Egypt and Babylon, actually serve unseen masters from other worlds or dimensions, who invisibly manage humanity for their own deceptive purposes? Could the ‘all-seeing eye’ staring relentlessly from atop the Masonic ‘pyramid’ actually be ‘alien’?
An institution was established in New York City in 1921 innocuously titled, ‘The Council on Foreign Relations’ the founding president was John W. Davis, personal attorney to J.P. Morgan.

Virtually every President of the United States, since its inception, has been a CFR member–not the least of which being, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Regardless of political party affiliation, Republican or Democrat, the American voters elect a President who is a representative of the CFR. The primary agenda of the Council, whose members include the world’s corporate, banking, military and media elite, (ostensibly a ‘good-old-boys’ club) is to ensure international economic stability. The Council’s covert agenda, as stated by member Admiral Chester Ward, former U.S. Judge Advocate General of the Navy, was the “…submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence to an all-powerful one-world government.” At this point it might be worth noting that the CFR is also interlocked with so-called ‘think-tanks’, namely Rand Corporation, Hudson Institute and the Brookings Institution.

This brings us back to the Brookings Institution study of 1960, which dealt with the possible impact of extra-terrestrial contact and how such an event might effect public ‘values, attitudes and behavior.” The successful structuring of a one-world order, either the ‘Protocol’s version or the CFR’s is absolutely dependant upon careful managing of public ‘attitudes, values and behavior’.

Global power is directed and maintained by skillfully crafted public perceptions—a tightly contained construct. The carefully woven paradigm that entraps Western Culture is based on a compelling illusion that humanity is an accident of evolution—alone in a godless universe. Humans are mere physical beings who exist only for their material needs. This perception coupled with an economic crush whereby the masses spend virtually their entire waking existence grubbing for paychecks to merely survive, leaves little time to question the validity of such a system. The whole edifice of a one-world order is designed to create a population of consumer robots.

The goal of world domination could never be achieved with a population of ‘spiritually enlightened’ individuals.

Recall the ‘Protocols’ imperative…“It is indispensable to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the Goyim the very principle of the godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.”

Human spirituality—the rediscovery, I suspect, of our spiritual core identity is the ultimate key to liberation–this truth has long been revered by many groups of indigenous peoples around the world, and the reason why they have been so ruthlessly suppressed–for they have been aware of the true ‘conspirators’ pulling our strings.
The full text of the ‘Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion’* reads like the ravings of a demon or alien that utterly despises the humans of Earth, yet desperately envies them as well. How ironic it would be to discover that it is our individual human ‘spirit’ or life-force energy that is this demented entity’s most coveted prize! To discover that the primal, human, life force or ‘soul’ is, an energy so precious that, like food, this malevolent parasite is compelled to access it vicariously. And how ironic it would be to also discover that the single purpose for structuring a One-World-Order; is for the global ‘harvesting’ of this energy as an absolutely guaranteed food source! The great tragedy of which, would be how our fellow humans in high office were duped and seduced into assisting such a despicable social aberration!

Yet, perhaps there is hope. Consider this text from Extra-terrestrial Friends and Foes, by George C. Andrews. (Published by Illuminet Press, 1993.)

“…other-dimensional predatory parasites…have been manipulating us as we manipulate cattle since time immemorial. Their hypnotic control over us is so complete that hardly anyone even begins to realize that they actually exist. But just as one can take effective measures to rid oneself of a tapeworm, when one realizes what the problem is, so humanity now has the opportunity to rid itself of these other-dimensional extraterrestrial parasites. An ever-increasingly widespread realization of the true nature of this predatory game is what will bring about liberation.”

Ultimately the growing ‘need’ for a One-World-Order, suggests an imminent threat to the overall paradigm of population control. Perhaps something unaccounted for threatens to disrupt the harvesting process—whatever the reason, it appears that the imperative for control is ‘out-of-control’ and suggests a possible coming shift in fundamental energies or perceptions that makes former inducements for control less effective and precipitates a growing need to impose more artificial, technological inducements.

Perhaps the entire construct, propped up with phony “values, attitudes and behavior” is teetering on the brink of collapse. Author David Icke, suggests “the fast emerging global fascist state or New World Order was a desperate attempt to hold the game together and stop the awakening people—especially through microchips that are designed to artificially suppress the quickening vibrations of a awakening humanity.” (Quote from, Tales from the Time Loop, Bridge of Love Publications, 2003.)

Icke foresees a time soon approaching when the old ‘behavior’ constructs will fall away entirely. “Now is the time when all that has been experienced in previous physical lifetimes will have to be called upon because the [alien] consciousness and its expressions through the economic, political, military and industrial establishments are not going to go quietly. But have no fear that it is going to go. It is already on the way. People who are awakening are finding themselves at odds with the society in which they live, and even within their families, too. As they expand their consciousness, they are accessing higher levels of knowledge, wisdom and understanding. Those with the courage to outwardly express how they feel are challenging conventional thinking and behavior of almost every kind. They are called everything from ‘loony’ to ‘dangerous’ by those still mesmerized by the physical world. The [alien] consciousness works hard to undermine them, just as it did two thousand years ago and on so many other occasions throughout history. But it will not succeed.”

(Quote from, The Robots’ Rebellion, Published by Gateway Books, 1994.)

(*Note: the full text of the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion can be found in the book, Behold a Pale Horse by Milton William Cooper, Light Technology Publishing, 1991.)

(Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs, Brookings Institution, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961.)

How Hollywood Spreads Disinformation About Secret Societies

By Vigilant

During the last years, a new trend appeared in Hollywood: secret societies being at the center of movie intrigues. Some might find this surprising since secret societies are supposed to be…well…secret. Many people in the movie industry are part of those Brotherhoods so what is the reasoning behind this? We’ll look at the myth Hollywood is trying to create by examining “National Treasure” and “Angels and Demons”.

A decade ago, movies about Freemasonry or the Illuminati were rare and far apart (see here a nice list of Masonic references in movies). There has however been a major switch during the last decade. The world wide public has witnessed major blockbuster movies featuring those Brotherhoods at the center of the story. Their exoteric symbols are abundantly displayed and some of their history is even explained. Why are those societies exposing themselves to the average movie goers, who, for the most part aren’t even aware of their existence? Isn’t secrecy an important requisite for the survival of those orders?

I believe an important change is taking place in the communication strategies of these elite societies. The advent of the digital age, where any individual can create and publish content has rendered the secrecy of such organizations impossible. Self-published websites, books, documentaries, DVDs and other medias have exposed many secrets of Masonry and other orders. Information which could only be found in rare and exclusive books is now a Google search away. I have encountered some Masons who were astonished by the level of knowledge possessed by the ”profane”. Those types of Masonic scholars, who aren’t actually initiated into the Brotherhood, were very rare not too long ago.

Since the digital switch is irreversible (and completed), occult orders have adapted their strategy to this new context (they’ve probably saw this coming years ago). The strategy is : “If they have to know about us, we’ll tell them what to know“. Through Hollywood and best-selling books, secret societies are being introduced to the average Joe but with one BIG condition: the public is given a distorted, caricatured and romantic portrayal of secret societies. We are introducing in pop culture a mythical lore around secret societies, associating them with fascinating symbols, treasures hunts and exotic adventures. The viewers believe they are actually learning facts about Freemasonry or the Illuminati and they leave the movies with a sense of wonder, fascination and admiration. Those feelings are however based on totally erroneous facts, dubious explanations and fairy tale story telling. After viewing those movies, the viewer has a positive predisposition concerning those orders and will be less inclined to believe and research conspiracies related to them.

READ MORE...

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

THE PROTOCOLS OF POLITICAL ZIONISM
AKA THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
INTRODUCTION, PREFACE AND PROTOCOLS #1 TO #2.
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=594

THE PROTOCOLS OF POLITICAL ZIONISM
AKA THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
THE PROTOCOLS #3 TO #11
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=595

THE PROTOCOLS OF POLITICAL ZIONISM
AKA THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
THE PROTOCOLS #12 TO #18
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=596

THE PROTOCOLS OF POLITICAL ZIONISM
AKA THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
THE PROTOCOLS #19 TO #24 (FINAL)
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=597

Did He Who Made the Lamb Make Section 13?

by Arthur Topham

July 19, 2009

“When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who make the Lamb make thee?

Tiger! Tiger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye,
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

~William Blake, (1757 - 1827)
from Songs of Experience, The Tiger

One of my fondest remembrances of passing through high school was the time spent in my Grade 12 English classes. My instructor, an elderly, refined English woman by the name of Mrs. Robertson, was the epitome of all those fine qualities that make up a good teacher and, like myself, she loved English literature and in particular the poets and writers of the 18th and 19th Centuries.

I had a school acquaintance at the time, a social buddy as well, who also enjoyed her classes and we would spend much time composing essays and discussing the finer philosophical points of the many enlightened artists of those days. The image above reminds me of the times that we would spend mulling and disputing and synthesizing our nascent, budding interests in truth and art as expressed in all that was best of the English writers.

One such 18th Century composer of rhyme was William Blake, a fearless visionary and valiant fighter for freedom of expression and spiritual questing. It is he whose immortal words contained in his poem The Tiger and quoted above that now move me today to extrapolate from his thoughts written almost two centuries ago yet as bright and burning in my own soul as they must have been when first forged within the mind of Blake himself.

It’s the issue of freedom of speech or expression. Call it what one will it’s the lifeblood of nation’s character, the spiritual essence that permeates all that a people or a culture can produce as the end-product of its collective consciousness, yet, and as fate would have it, at a time in history when one would imagine that after the effects of the Renaissance period and the Age of Enlightenment and Reason we would by now have progressed as a civilization to stages of democratic and literary growth and freedom where such present realities would have once been deemed contrary to reason and logic, we now find ourselves living in times when this amazing, God-given ability to cogitate and question in the open atmosphere of rightful and peaceful liberty is under dire and imminent threat.

And it’s not restricted to any particular nation either. What we’re witnessing now in Canada under the infamous “Section 13(1)” legislation, contained in the Canadian Human Rights Act, is also being played out in practically every other democratic nation around the world using various legalese terminology. Our sister colonies from “down under,” Australia and New Zealand, are now both living under the Iron Heel of repressive “hate” legislation, bred and birthed by the same Zionist forces who assisted in the still-born delivery of Canada’s section 13(1) after the 911 false flag in September of 2001.

As one associate from New Zealand put it after reading my last article The Silence of the Wolves:

“Yes I do believe that people are starting to understand the nature of what you are up against .. because the UK, the USA and NZ have fallen .. NZ is Rothschild property.

I feel certain of your eventual victory .. but it’s for sure they are going to throw everything at your group because Canada is the last man standing .. you cannot be allowed to win.

So I pray for the success of your sacred mission .. Freedom of Speech .. Peace and Justice!”

Well my friend from the land down-under I too am praying for a positive resolution to this over-powering problem that now besets our respective nations and as my old mentor Blake also once stated, until this anti-free speech legislation is erased from the statutes of Canadian jurisprudence, “I shall not cease from mental fight, nor shall my sword sleep in my hand.”

But the purpose of this short Sunday epistle is not to delve too deeply into the nuts and bolts that hold together this flawed piece of legal machinery (sec. 13) now affecting me and my website and those of countless others who write or blog or publish the works of a growing number of dissident thinkers who also realize the nature of the game being played out here with our cherished rights and freedoms.

Rather I’d like to comment on the question posed in the title to this short piece. Did He who made the Lamb also make the Zionists (who in turn made Section 13)? My guess, based on a lifetime of experience in studying practically every esoteric, philosophical, ideological and ontological system known to man, is that He did. The big question though for those who believe in God or a supreme Creator is why?

To find the answer to that I think we need to return to Blake and to ponder the whole question of whether we live in a moral universe or an immoral one and whether or not we can bring ourselves to the point of accepting in general terms the notion that this world is basically a balance between two forces, those of “good” and those of “evil.” It’s a duality; a balance of yin and yang; of light and darkness.

It is interesting that Alexandr Solzhenitsyn touches on this very issue in his small book of speeches given in the USA after his expulsion from the USSR back in the 1970’s called Warning to the West. Again, in his speech to the AFL-CIO in NYC, referring to Communism he said:

“Communism has never concealed the fact that it rejects all absolute concepts of morality. It scoffs at any consideration of “good” and “evil” as indisputable categories. Communism considers morality to relative, to be a class matter. Depending upon circumstances and the political situation, any act, including murder, even the killing of hundreds of thousands, could be good or could be bad. It all depends upon class ideology. And who defines this ideology? The whole class cannot get together to pass judgment. A handful of people determine what is good and what is bad. But I must say that in this very respect Communism has been most successful. I has infected the whole world with the belief in the relativity of good and evil. Today, many people apart from the communists are carried away by this idea. Among progressive people, it is considered rather awkward to use seriously such words as “good” and “evil.” Communism has managed to persuade all of us that these concepts are old-fashioned and laughable. But if we are to be deprived of the concepts of good and evil, what will be left? Nothing but the manipulation of one another. We will sink to the status of animals.

Both the theory and the practice of Communism are completely inhuman for that reason. There is a word very commonly used these days: “anti-Communism.” That is a poor, tasteless locution. It makes it appear as though Communism were something original, fundamental. Therefore, it is taken as the point of departure, and anti-Communism is defined in relation to Communism. I say that this word was poorly selected, that it was put together by people who do not understand etymology. The primary, the eternal concept is humanity, and Communism is anti-humanity. A poor construction. So we should say: That which is against Communism is for humanity. Not to accept, but to reject this inhuman Communist ideology is simply to be a human being. Such a rejection is more than a political act. It is a protest of our souls against those who would have us forget the concepts of good and evil.”

If we take Solzhenitsyn’s word “Communism” and substitute the more modern, recent expression of this self-same ideology and use the word “Zionism” then we will be one step closer to understanding at least the two basic principles here being discussed.

The term good refers to all that is positive, filled with the light of truth, geared toward harmony and peace and plenty; wholesome and holistic and meaningful and pleasing to all from the new-born babe to the eldest of the elders. On the contrary the term evil refers to all that is in opposition to these life-given qualities or traits that are the hallmarks of a sane and healthy and happy and harmonious society. Deception, lies, murder, hatred, subterfuge, hypocrisy, war, pollution, violence come to mind immediately in juxtaposition to the live-enhancing precepts first mentioned.

We might, for the sake of simplicity and analogy compare the two with Blake’s lamb and tiger. They exist in a symbiotic relationship with each other and kept in balance they preserve the equilibrium of the species. On the other hand if the tigers grow to great in their number and their power and their ferocity then the lambs face the imminent threat of both overwhelming attack and possible annihilation.

Today humanity faces just such an existential challenge when it comes to the looming problem of political Zionism and the effects which it has had upon the world since it began to gain excessive power and influence in the affairs of nations around the turn of the 20th Century.

What it boils down to is what Solzhenitsyn warned the west of – deluding ourselves into accepting the evils of Communism/Zionism as being merely relative. Instead we must come to the realization that Zionism is not relatively benign but rather the most deadly ideological program for anti-humanitarianism ever devised by the evil and dark side of the human mind. It must be stopped dead in its tracks and a balance found. Or else?
———-

Arthur Topham is the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com. He is currently involved in a free speech battle with the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada.

He is also in extremely dire need of financial support to sustain this battle with the forces of repression and censorship as he is not able to work during this period of intense litigation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the CHR Tribunal. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120 . Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com .

For the Full Monty on the complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995